|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Overall Length: 48" (173cm)
Synthetic Longsword Type II Scent Stopper Pommel
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Synthetic Longsword Type II: We are now introducing our next in line for our synthetic series of swords. We designed the Type II longsword to have similar flex features as a real steel longsword, but with the added safety and balance of a training sword. Protective gear is required to use the weapon. Consult your instructor or safety official before using this weapon. Use at your own risk. Some of the exclusive enhancements to this product include:
Christian Tobler at WMAW2009 instructing during freeplay.
"What an outstanding product, I will take two now and 10 more when I get back to my group..." WMAW Customers 2009. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is the main difference between the synthetic and wood, in terms of intended use? Which has better/worse handling characteristics (when compared to steel), ‘feel’ (e.g. on impact or in the bind), etc.? Certainly knights,
legionnaires, samurai and everyone in-between have been
using wood for over 2000 years. So it clearly is an
excellent choice in martial training for most people and has
trained more people for battle than any other system.
We came out with the synthetic line exclusively for for
people who train with a bit more blade contact and
repetitive contact drills than others. The synthetics
also do absorb some of the blade contact similar to steel.
Both in flex and material characteristics and reportedly
binding is better than the wood. Since the wood may bounce
the blades a bit more. What is the difference in durability? The synthetic requires minimal maintenance. While we have wasters over 10 years old with zero maintenance done to them, I think the synthetics are more resistant to neglect.
Type I
|